Home » Certification Exams
Category Archives: Certification Exams
I was definitely a proponent of expiring certifications when the topic came up. Why? Because my value as an MCSE was diminished by others who held the same title… from Windows NT. By making professionals renew their certifications we obtained the ability to differentiate between someone with current value and skills and knowledge and someone whose knowledge and skills were obsolete.
I am not saying this position is coming back to bite me, only that I am probably at a cross-roads, and I have some decisions to make.
I got this e-mail recently. I actually got two of them that were nearly identical, with the one line differentiator:
Okay, so I have to decide whether to renew my VCP credentials. It is not an easy decision – not because I have not found value in being a VCP (I have). However I have not spent as much time in the past couple of years working with large scale VMware environments, and I don’t know if I would have the time and resources needed in order to study for and pass the exam. It is a tough choice (not on the VCP4, but for VCP5).
I am not only on the line for VMware though… I remember when I earned my MCSE: Private Cloud certification with Microsoft Learning. It was cool to be among the first to earn what I consider to be a very prestigious certification. Seeing the words CHARTER MEMBER along the top was not exactly new to me, but I still took great pride in it.
Fast-forward three years (slightly more, as the renewal exams were not ready in time) and I notice, when looking at my MCP page, the following ugly note:
Of course, if we look back to the beginning of this article, I would be a hypocrite if I really thought this was an ugly note… it is just the reality, and if I want the renewal to apply to others so that my certifications retain their value, obviously I have to renew as well so that everyone else’s certifications retain their value.
The question is though… would I pass the required exams if I sat them today? The answer is, unfortunately, probably not.
I have a couple of options.
- I can make the decision to allow these certs to lapse. I will always be a ‘Former VCP and Former MCSE: Private Cloud.’
- I can decide to buckle down and study, preparing for the exams.
The long-time faithful readers of my blog will know that I have said before that you should not study for exams (see article). I said ‘The best way to know technology is to use it, and if you read the recommended pre-requisites for most exams they say that you should have a minimum of two years experience with the technology.’ Well I already proved that I knew the technologies – I proved it by earning the certs in the first place. However over the last three years my career my priorities were different, and I took extended breaks from using the technologies the certs apply to.
Does that mean I am done? No… when I said I took a break I meant it, and I am currently working on a number of projects, some involving VMware and some involving Microsoft’s Private Cloud. While I know that for the Microsoft certs I will need to take a recertifying exam, for the VCP I found the following on their FAQ:
Well at least they don’t beat around the bush.
On the VMware side I now have just under two months to prepare (if I am going to), and on the Microsoft side I have until the end of October. Will I do it? On one? On both?
I don’t know if I will recertify on VMware… Exam prep is tough, and I frankly do not think I get the same benefit out of it that I do Microsoft. That is to say, I do not think that there is an opportunity that I would lose if I said ‘I was a VCP-DCV, but let it lapse.’ Most of my clients are just as happy knowing that I am proficient in VMware, even if the cert has lapsed.
Microsoft is a different story. Don’t get me wrong – my reputation with regard to Microsoft technologies is pretty solid. However if I let that cert lapse I do not know if I will be able to renew my MCT (Microsoft Certified Trainer) for 2016 (I just renewed it for 2015, but we have to think ahead). You never know what requirements they will ask at renewal time, and every senior certification on my transcript is a step in the right direction.
With that being said, according to the Certification Planner on the Microsoft Learning portal, I am a single exam shy of earning both my MCSA: Windows Server 2012 and my MCSE: Desktop Infrastructure, and one more exam short for my MCSE: Server Infrastructure certifications. (411 and 413 for those who are counting). To recertify for MCSE: Private Cloud I need to write exam 981, which is essentially an upgrade exam (based on the exam objectives for 246 and 247). If you type the term “Upgrade Exam” into the search box of this blog, you can read about how unpleasant those can be.
With all of that being said, I passed them once… I should be able to pass them again… I think, hope, pray. Fortunately, I have two things going for me: 1) There is a Second Shot Free offer currently available, so if I fail an exam I can retake it at no cost… well, at the cost of another half-day off of work. 2) As an MCT I am entitled to a 50% discount off my exams.
I haven’t decided which way I will go… in theory, four exam passes will give me five key certifications:
- VMware Certified Professional: Datacenter Virtualization
- MCSA: Windows Server 2012
- MCSE: Desktop Infrastructure
- MCSE: Server Infrastructure
- MCSE: Private Cloud
Since MCSE: Private Cloud is no longer offered, I wouldn’t mind holding onto it for the sake of nostalgia. The other MCSEs? Well, none of them would hurt to hold. As for the MCSA… Yeah, I am sure there are a bunch of you who are surprised that I don’t hold that one. When I came back from Japan last year it was my intention to sit a bunch of exams, and I did… but many of you know that my head was very much elsewhere, and what with my personal issues my head just wasn’t in it… I have been one exam shy for a long time, but I do plan to go get it.
So I guess during the writing of this article I have talked myself back into a certification mode… who’s with me?
Although it is not something I am proud of, I have failed a number (the exact number is quite secret!) of certification exams. I am not proud of this fact, but the reality is I have taken a number of exams that I have been unprepared for, and that is a sure-fire way to come up short. I have always (not true… since becoming more enlightened, maybe!) felt that if I was going to shell out USD$125 to fail an exam (Actually, the first two were at USD$100) I should at least walk away with something… the consolation prize should not simply be a sheet of paper telling us that we failed.
So then what can we gain from failing? We can learn what we need to concentrate on in order to actually pass the exam. Let’s say you are a desktop deployment specialist for his company. You are responsible for the deployment of systems across the country, which you do using the Microsoft Deployment Toolkit 2008 and System Center Configuration Manager 2007. Your manager informs you that there is a new deployment exam available (70-635) and that the new department policy is that all deployment specialists must obtain the MCTS: Business Desktop Deployment to be eligible for promotions or bonuses. You schedule the exam, and as you sit there taking the test you realize that you do not know a lot about Windows Deployment Services, managing images for multiple languages, driver groups, and MDOP. Crud, that makes up about forty percent of the exam, and lo and behold you fail.
You could hang your head in shame as you walk away from the testing centre… or you can go back to your office and learn what you are missing; you can set up a lab environment to deploy images in French with Windows Deployment Services; you can implement driver groups, and learn everything you need to know about MDOP, and you can go back to the testing centre a few days or weeks later and retake the exam… and pass.
I am ashamed to say that there are a couple of exams that I have failed and have not yet gone back to rewrite… with an emphasis on the word yet. Most of the titles I have failed I have gone home, brushed up, and retaken successfully a few days (or weeks) later. They are all things that do not apply to what I have been doing… but don’t worry, I’ll get to them!
It is simply a matter of attitude… ‘Why the heck would I have to know that?’ is the wrong attitude; if for no other reason, then you have to know whatever that is in order to pass the exam. I know someone who failed an exam by fewer than twenty points – often a sign that he missed it by a single question. He came out and said ‘I know what I got wrong… I’ll just retake the exam tomorrow and change that one question that I got wrong!’ He did… and failed by fewer than forty points – probably two questions.
Don’t waste it… if you find an exam tough, then you should be taking notes on the sheet they give you. 1) Windows Deployment Services. 2) Multiple Languages… and so forth. Of course you have to surrender that sheet when you are finished the exam… but if at the very end you reread your notes, you should remember a lot of what you are missing when it comes time to study.
With Microsoft’s Second Shot Free promotion you can actually fail the first time for free… though I do not recommend this as a goal. When you are prepared for the exam, register for it using the promotion, and then do your best. If you fail, it costs you nothing to go home and study some more, and then rewrite it. If you pass, then you get a pleasant surprise, a new certification, and a discount on your next exam.
Thomas Edison was once interviewed about the electric light bulb. He did not get it right on the first shot… in fact it took him over two thousand tries and when asked he said ‘I never failed… I just learned two thousand ways how not to make a light bulb!’ Use that attitude when taking your next test.
… and good luck!
A couple of weeks ago I wrote about how tough I found Exam 74-409 was in my article Another Tough Exam. I also mentioned that Microsoft exams were meant to be tough, and going into an exam unprepared can (and usually will) come back to bite you.
Last week I decided to bite the bullet and try to take home at least three certifications in a single marathon day of exams… I was hoping to achieve my MCSA: Windows 8, MCSA: Windows Server 2012, and my MCSE: Desktop Infrastructure in a single bound by passing three exams:
70-416: Implementing Desktop Application Environments
70-417: Upgrading Your Skills to MCSA Windows Server 2012
70-688: Managing and Maintaining Windows 8
The goal was lofty, but I felt I was up to the challenge. I was wrong… but not terribly so.
Before going on I should mention that I am no dummy… I am just very busy, and taking the time to sit exams one at a time is a bit of a pain for me – I would rather, when I have to, simply write two or three in a single day. Of course, this greatly reduces my chances of passing all of them, but because of the Microsoft and Prometric Second Shot Free offer for Microsoft Certified Trainers (see article) there is less of a risk – MCTs get a discount on the cost of exams, as well as a Second Shot. My financial gamble on this day was minimal. I have, by the by, passed three exams in a single day once… May 3, 2011 I passed three MCTS exams on Windows Server 2008. If I could do it once, I could surely do it again.
Passing three exams in a single day was not easy, but they were all on the same general technology – Windows Server 2008. On this silly day I went after three exams – one on Windows 8 (which I would have been surprised had I failed), one on Desktop Application environments (Windows 8 applications with a healthy dose of Windows Server, Remote Desktop Services, App-V, Group Policy, Microsoft Office, and several deployment tools), and one on Windows Server 2012…kinda.
Thinking back to my early days of certification marathons, I remember hearing the horrors of Upgrade exams. Essentially you are taking three exams in one. The first Upgrade exam I sat was 70-292: Managing and Maintaining a Microsoft Windows Server 2003 Environment for an MCSA Certified on Windows 2000. My success with this exam could be summed up with the old adage: Third time’s a charm. I passed it in June of 2006… over a year after my first attempt.
Although I did have success with the MCDST (Desktop Support Technician) upgrade exam 70-621: Upgrading your MCDST Certification to MCITP Enterprise Support I did not fare nearly as well on the server side – 70-648 TS: Transition from Windows Server 2003 MCSA to Windows Server 2008 and TS: Transition from Windows Server 2003 MCSE to Windows Server 2008 (both of which I sat as beta exams and, coincidentally, on the same day) were not my finest hours. I decided instead to sit all of the exams for these certifications instead of going the upgrade path again.
In hindsight, had I thought of that when scheduling the exams, I would not have done it. Three exams in one day is mentally tough enough… add to that one of them is actually three exams, and even I wouldn’t have done it.
I never got into a rhythm for the exam, and did not notice that it was not one exam as one block of time, it was actually three sections, each with their own sub-block of time. Unfortunately I only realized this when, with ten unanswered questions on Section 1, a pop-up warned me that I had two minutes to complete the section. Without reading anything I clicked through and selected an answer for as many as I could (four) before being forced to leave six questions unanswered.
Now that I knew this was the case, I managed my time for the remaining sections much better… but four blind darts and six blanks doomed me.
You did not pass the exam.
I do not remember the actual wording of it, but that’s what it said… I had felt pretty good going into that last ‘Are You Sure?! ‘ button, which is why I was heartbroken when it came up. Damn damn damn.
Wait a minute… I did a double-take when I noticed that my score was below 600. 583? No way, I know I did better than that, there MUST BE SOME MISTAKE! I don’t know the procedures for challenging an exam result (nor do I know if there is such a procedure) but at the end of the day when I collected my score reports I was going to find out.
Okay, that was only one of the exams… the server exam, which I could re-sit next week sometime. I got my mindset into the application environment. It was a really tough exam, but I passed it with a pretty respectable score. I then went on to the Managing Windows 8 exam, which after the ordeal of the two previous exams was like a walk in the park. I am not saying that any end user – or an IT Pro who isn’t intimately familiar with Windows 8 – could pass without a lot of preparation, but I have lived Windows 8 every day of the last 2.5 years, and even though that last ‘Are You Sure?!’ button is always nerve wracking, I passed very respectably.
Okay, good. At least I could hold my head high with the knowledge that I would walk away with two Windows certifications today… MCSA: Windows 8, and MCSE: Desktop Infrastructure. Now I could go look at the score report and go give someone a piece of my mind!
First the good news… I am not as much of a Windows Server bonehead as I thought. I did not realize that for the Upgrade exam each section is marked as a complete exam… the score report actually comes out like this:
70-410: Installing and Configuring Windows Server 2012: 800
70-411: Administering Windows Server 2012: 583
70-412: Configuring Advanced Windows Server 2012 Services: 766
Aha… while the results of certification exams are really binary – Pass/Fail – I felt a lot better knowing that had they averaged out my score for the three exams I would have passed, and the abysmal score that displayed on screen was just that of the lowest section – quite obviously the section on which I only answered 2/3 of the questions. Alright, I feel better about that, and now that I know, the next time I sit the exam I can manage my time properly (I’ll bet you if you scour my blog you will see that advice for exam takers) and pass with authority.
I was wrong about something else on this day though… Although I thought the prerequisites for the MCSE: Desktop Infrastructure were my MCSA Windows 8 and the 70-416 exam, it turns out that the first prerequisite is actually my MCSA Windows Server 2012… alas, I would only be walking away with one certification today, and not two as I was hoping and expecting. With that said, if/when I do pass my 70-417 Upgrade exam I will with one pass earn two senior certifications… and that ain’t all bad as they say.
The old expression says that the shoemaker’s children go barefoot. I got bit quite a bit by not following my own advice. Fortunately Microsoft and Prometric have my back, and I can come back and re-sit the exam for free. That is one piece of advice I did listen to – make sure you check for any offers such as the Second Shot before you register for your exam. Although I have registered for several exams with previous similar offers, this is the first time I will need the safety net. However just because you are confident does not mean you should be stupid… take any offer they will give you, and save your money. I am glad I did!
I often tell people who are worried about taking Microsoft exams for fear of failing that I have failed more exams than most people have ever taken – to date over twenty failures, including one miserable exam that I only passed on my fourth attempt.
Don’t worry, I do pass more than I fail. Something else that I often tell people is that there is a lot that you can learn from failing a certification exam – if you are only willing to learn from it. Every time I fail an exam I try to remember the questions that have me stymied, and as soon as I walk out of the exam room I write down whatever I can remember so that I can look them up later on. That is how I learned the ocsetup command. In fact, that is how I learned a lot of the PowerShell cmdlets and command-line switches that I use.
Every exam – in fact, every exam question – gives you the opportunity to comment. Unfortunately I am always reticent; I know that I don’t know everything, and frankly I used to be worried that if I commented that I thought something was wrong, I would be showing my ignorance. This phobia doubled as a ridiculous assumption that someone at Microsoft Learning cares how much Mitch Garvis knows or doesn’t know… beyond the obvious pass/fail requirement of the exam.
I have heard people tell me that they don’t leave comments because they don’t think that people actually read those comments. I can tell you with absolute certainty that someone does… most of the time that someone is a wonderful woman named Liberty Munson.
I first met Liberty in 2006, and have often referred to her as a witch – not because she is anything other than kind and warm, but because I am reasonably sure she can sit an exam on any subject matter in the world with complete ignorance on the subject… and pass. You see, Liberty is a Psychometrician – an expert in exams. Although I still don’t like commenting on exams, occasionally I have a question or comment about something on an exam, and I ask Liberty.
I took issue with a particular question on exam 74-409 (Server Virtualization with Windows Server Hyper-V and System Center). I walked out of the exam with a sigh of relief at 10:45am… and at 4:30 that issue was still nagging at me. I sent an e-mail about it and made my point.
Within an hour I got a reply from Liberty – I had not actually taken my issue to her, but rather to a friend at Microsoft Learning, who passed it on for me. Nonetheless Liberty replied directly. In the hour since I had sent my ‘complaint’, she had tracked down the exact question I was referring to, figured out who had written it, and gotten a response from the item writer. While I completely disagreed with the response (it was not a right/wrong argument, rather a in-scope/out-of-scope argument), I was thrilled that I got the response.
Now here’s the thing… we can’t all e-mail Liberty every time we disagree with a question on an exam. That is simply not how it works. The best way to contact her if you don’t agree with a question is to click that Comment button on your exams. You may not (read: will not) get a direct reply, but is the best way for you to help the Learning Experiences team to maintain the highest level of quality in their exams.
By the way, while I do not know this for sure from personal experience, my best advice is to never play cards with a psychometrician for money… it will never end well
This is one of those situations I laugh at… because even great organizations like Microsoft Learning Experience is going to make the occasional mistake.. especially when it’s systems are all automated and unmonitored.
I received the following e-mail today congratulating me on passing my exam yesterday:
I was reasonably sure that I already had that certification, but just in case I logged onto the MCP Portal to check my transcript. Sure enough…
Now here’s the thing… the e-mail is right, I never passed 70-247… but I didn’t have to. If you passed 70-659 before a certain date then it replaced the requirement for the 70-247 exam… but if the automated system checks people who have passed the requisite exams as of today (and not as of June, 2012) then it is right… I shouldn’t have the cert.
I’ll chalk this one up to a funny system glitch… no action required
I maintain a spreadsheet of every certification exam I take – pass or fail. Excluding the title line it currently consists of seventy (70) rows, dating back to my first failed exam in December of 2001. I don’t remember when I started maintaining it, but it goes back a while, and consists of the following cells:
TitleExam CodeTesting CentreResultApplicable Cert
Yesterday morning (January 15) I was happy to pull it open because I had just passed exam 74-409 (See article). It was a bit of a milestone because it was the seventieth exam I have written in a little over twelve years (I sat my first exam, 70-215, on December 11, 2001). It includes three that I have re-sat after having passed, a lot of failures (including one exam that I failed three times before passing!) and overall the good, the bad, the ugly – the pride and the shame, all in one spreadsheet, which includes a rule to highlight the word PASS or FAIL appropriately so that I can see streaks and trends.
As I will often do when I open the spreadsheet, I took a couple of minutes to see if anything jumped out at me… and sure enough, there it was. In 2013 I did not sit a single exam. It is the first year since I failed that first exam that I did not even attempt an exam in a calendar year. In fact, since the last exam I sat was August 12, 2012 (71-414 – Implementing an Advanced Server Infrastructure), meaning it was a full seventeen months between exams – the longest gap/draught ever for me.
Does this mean I have been negligent in my career planning? Not at all. IT Professionals do not have to take exams on a set schedule in order to properly maintain their career paths. However it is important that we make sure that our certifications remain relevant, and that will mean different things to different people.
Some IT Pros are content to ride their Microsoft Certified Systems Engineer (MCSE) on Windows 2000 (or NT!) all the way into the next decade. Others want to earn every certification as soon as they can and remain at the head of the pack. Somewhere between these two camps sit the moderate camp of people who get certified on every second version of a software or solution.
Is one of these positions right or wrong? While I certainly feel that certifications become stale and irrelevant, how often you recertify depends on your career goals and needs. I am glad that the new generation of Microsoft certifications actually do have retirement dates – IT Pros will have to recertify every few years or they will lose their credentials. Microsoft tried several years ago to retire the MCSEs on Windows NT, but because they had not planned for this scenario from the outset they were unable to do so legally. Simply put, people invested in their certifications and were not told up front that they would have an expiry date. Now when you take a certification exam you know up front that your credentials will be retired unless you maintain them.
My first certifications were on Windows Server 2000, and while some of the information I learned back then is still relevant, most of what we do today is completely new – IPv6 did not exist, nor did x86 server virtualization. There were questions on my exam yesterday that included several aspects of System Center, IPv6, Hyper-V, Active Directory Recycle Bin, Live Migration, Virtual Machine exports, Volume Shadow Copy, Virtual Hard Disks, Fibre Channel, QoS, and NIC Teaming… none of which existed in any form when Windows Server 2000 was current. Sure, I am still an MCSA on Windows Server 2000 (I only earned my MCSE with Windows Server 2003), but it is completely irrelevant… and nobody would hire me based on my complete understanding of a fourteen year old operating system.
On the other side of the scale, I am also a Microsoft Certified Solutions Expert (MCSE): Private Cloud. I earned that credential in June of 2012 – three months before the release of Windows Server 2012. I earned it based on my proficiency in Windows Server 2008 R2 and the then newly released System Center 2012. Is that certification still relevant? Sure… both Windows Server 2008 R2 and System Center 2012 are prevalent in production IT environments around the world. Even if they weren’t, as they are essentially only one generation removed from the current ‘latest and greatest’ and while there are certainly huge improvements in the newer versions, they are still familiar enough that the one-generation-off is still recognizable and familiar.
Yesterday’s exam was only the third Windows Server 2012 exam that I have written, and because of the new certification model I do not actually have any Windows Server 2012 certs. In order to become an MCSA: Windows Server 2012 I am missing the exam 417 (Upgrading Your Skills to MCSA Windows Server 2012). Then to earn my MCSE: Server Infrastructure I will need to pass exam 413 (Designing and Implementing a Server Infrastructure).
In order to close all of these out, I seem to be four exams short. While I am not sure I will be able to complete them all before I go back to Japan, I will be trying to do at least a couple of them. Unlike yesterday’s exam though I plan to prepare for them. While I consider myself strong in both Windows Server 2012 and Windows 8, none of us know everything that they are likely to test us on. I will try my best to not go into another exam unprepared.
As usual, I will be taking you all along for the ride. While I cannot take you into the exam centre (I don’t think we would all fit, and that would be illegal) but I will tell you about my experiences in each exam. Hopefully it will help to give you the impetus to take your next exams. Are you missing some? Are you just starting out, or thinking of going down a new certification path?
If you aren’t sure where you stand, the Microsoft Learning Members Page has a new Certification Planner tool that can guide you toward success. Since most of us don’t know off the top of our heads what exams are needed for what certifications, this handy tool will let you know how many exams (or other prerequisites) you are missing for each credential. If you have even one prerequisite for a credential it will be listed there, and you can see what you are missing. Check it out – you may be closer than you thought!
Of course, most IT Pros won’t need all of the certifications available… and chasing them is both time consuming and costly. Trainers are usually going to have more certifications because they need the credentials in order to teach the courses. That is why I started chasing them… and while I am no longer a full-time trainer, until I decide what I want to be when I grow up I am going to keep chasing them… you never know when someone is going to call on you to teach a class after all, and I like to keep my options open!
Check out the certification planner, and go schedule that next exam… yes, I am talking to you, Mr.Legacy MCSE, Mr. One-Exam Short! Good luck!
As a subject matter expert (SME) on virtualization, I was neither excited nor intimidated when Microsoft announced their new exam, 74-409: Server Virtualization with Windows Server Hyper-V and System Center. Unlike many previous exams I did not rush out to be the first to take it, nor was I going to wait forever. I actually thought about sitting the exam in Japan in December, but since I had trouble registering there and then got busy, I simply decided to use my visit to Canada to schedule the exam.
This is not the first exam that I have gone into without so much as a glance at the Overview or the Skills Measured section of the exam page on the Internet. I did not do any preparation whatsoever for the exam… as you may know I have spent much of the last five years living and breathing virtualization. This attitude very nearly came back to bite me in the exam room at the Learning Academy in Hamilton, Ontario Wednesday morning.
Having taught every Microsoft server virtualization course ever produced (and having written or tech-reviewed many of them) I should have known better. Virtualization is more than installing Hyper-V. it’s more than just System Center Virtual Machine Manager (VMM) and Operations Manager (OpsMgr). It is the entire Private Cloud strategy… and if you plan to sit this exam you had better have more than a passing understanding of System Center Service Manager (ServMgr), Data Protection Manager (DPM), and Orchestrator. Oh, and your knowledge should extend beyond more than one simple Hyper-V host.
I have long professed to my students that while DPM is Microsoft’s disaster recovery solution, when it comes down to it just make sure that your backup solution does everything that they need, and make sure to test it. While I stand behind that statement for production environments, it does not hold water when it comes to Microsoft certification exams. When two of the first few questions were on DPM I did a little silent gulp to myself… maybe I should have prepared a little better for this.
I do not use Service Manager… It’s not that I wouldn’t – I have a lot of good things to say about it. Heck, I even installed it as recent as yesterday – but I have not used it beyond a passing glance. The same used to be true of System Center Orchestrator, but over the last year that has changed a lot… I have integrated it into my courseware, and I have spent some time learning it and using it in production environments for repetitive tasks. While I am certainly not an expert in it, I am at least more than just familiar with it. That familiarity may have helped me on one exam question. Had I taken the time to review the exam page on the Microsoft Learning Experience website I would have known that the word Orchestrator does not appear anywhere on the page.
Here’s the problem with Microsoft exams… especially the newer ones that do not simply cover a product, but an entire solution across multiple suites. Very few of us will use and know every aspect covered on the exam. That is why I have always professed that no matter how familiar you may be with the primary technology covered, you should always review the exam page and fill in your knowledge gaps with the proper studying. You should even spend a few hours reviewing the material that you are pretty sure you do know. As I told my teenaged son when discussing his exams, rarely will you have easy exams… if you feel it was easy it just means you were sufficiently prepared. Five questions into today’s exam I regretted my blasé attitude towards it – I may be a virtualization expert, but I was not adequately prepared.
As I went through the exam I started to get into a groove… while there are some aspects of Hyper-V that I have not implemented, those are few and far between. the questions about VHDX files, Failover Clustering, Shared VHDX, Generation 2 VMs, and so many more came around and seemed almost too easy, but like I told my son it just means I am familiar with the material. There were one or two questions which I considered to be very poorly worded, but I reread the questions and the answers and gave my best answer based on my understanding of them.
I have often described the time between pressing ‘End Exam’ and the appearance of the Results screen to be an extended period of excruciating forced lessons in patience. That was not the case today – I was surprised that the screen came up pretty quickly. While I certainly did not ace the exam, I did pass, and not with the bare minimum score. It was certainly a phew moment for a guy who considers himself pretty smart in virtualization.
Now here’s the question… is the exam a really tough one, or was I simply not prepared and thus considered it tough? And frankly, how tough could it have been if I didn’t prepare, and passed anyways? I suppose that makes two questions. The answer to both is that while I did not prepare for the exam, I am considered by many (including Microsoft) a SME on Hyper-V and System Center. I can say with authority that it was a difficult exam. That then leads to the next question, is it too tough? While I did give that some thought as I left the exam (my first words to the proctor was ‘Wow that was a tough exam!) I do not think it is unreasonably so. It will require a lot of preparation – not simply watching the MVA Jump Start videos (which are by the way excellent resources, and should be considered required watching for anyone planning to sit the exam). You will need to build your own environment, do a lot of reading and research, and possibly more.
If you do plan to sit this exam, make sure you visit the exam page first by clicking here. Make sure you expand and review the Overview and Skills Measured sections. If you review the Preparation Materials section it will refer you to a five day course that is releasing next week from Microsoft Learning Experience – 20409A- Server Virtualization with Windows Server Hyper-V and System Center (5 Days). I am proud to say that I was involved with the creation of that course, and that it will help you immensely, not only with the exam but with your real-world experience.
Incidentally, passing the exam gives you the following cert: Microsoft Certified Specialist: Server Virtualization with Hyper-V and System Center.
Good luck, and go get em!