Home » Posts tagged 'VMware'
Tag Archives: VMware
While he may not be very well know to the Microsoft community, Mike Laverick is a legend in VMware circles. Mike owns a blog called RTFM Education, a source of white papers for VMware technology, although he did start out as a Microsoft Certified Trainer. He now works for VMware as a Senior Cloud Infrastructure Evangelist. I was very happy to read on his blog that he has decided to try learning Hyper-V and Microsoft’s Private Cloud. Unfortunately from what I can tell he was still trying to think way too VMware, rather that trying to learn the Microsoft way of doing things.
(To read the article follow this link:
This is a problem that I see all the time, and going both ways. When I was teaching vSphere Infrastructure classes my Microsoft-focused students had a hard time getting out of the Microsoft mindset. When I teach Microsoft courses, my VMware students have the same problem going the other direction. It would be much easier if people would open their minds and just let the technology flow… but then I have been a Star Wars fan for too long so I believe in that sort of thing.
I found several points of the article quite amusing. Mike opens the article with a picture and quote from the book Windows NT Microsoft Cluster Server. The first words that he actually types are ‘Mmm, so much has changed since then or has it?’ I am sorry Mike, but to even insinuate that Microsoft Clustering in Windows Server 2012 R2 is anywhere near the disaster that was clustering in Windows NT (or Server 2000, or Server 2003) is a joke. Yes, you have to have the proper pieces in place, and yes, you have to configure it properly. You even have to spend a little time learning Microsoft Clustering and how it works. If you were to spend thirty minutes with someone like me I’d say you’d be good.
Also, I know you don’t like that you have to install the Failover Clustering Feature to all of the servers before you can create your cluster. However please remember that unlike a pure hypervisor, Windows Server is an operating system that does many things for many people. To install all of the possible features out of the box is a ridiculous notion – for one thing, it would triple the footprint and multiply exponentially the attack surface of Windows Server… to say nothing of having code running that you don’t need which takes resources.
To save time, I recommend the following PowerShell cmdlets:
Install-WindowsFeature –Name Failover-Clustering –IncludeManangementTools –ComputerName MyServer1
Install-WindowsFeature –Name Failover-Clustering –IncludeManangementTools –ComputerName MyServer2
Install-WindowsFeature –Name Failover-Clustering –IncludeManangementTools –ComputerName MyServer3
New-Cluster –Name MyCluster –Node MyServer1, MyServer2, MyServer3 –StaticAddress 172.17.10.5
(There are probably ways to wildcard that – -ComputerName * or something, but that is not the point of the article).
The point of this article is not to Mike’s article apart – for one thing, he is probably doing better on Microsoft technology than I would have when I was new to VMware, for another I have great respect for him, both as a person and as an IT Pro. I just find it amusing that a VMware evangelist is struggling to learn Hyper-V and System Center, just as so many of the Microsoft evangelists have been struggling to learn VMware. There is a huge learning curve to be sure… no matter which way you go.
While I am reasonably fluent and certified in both technologies, there is no question that I favour Microsoft… just as Mike favours VMware. I am glad to see that he is trying to learn Microsoft though… even though some of the ways he is going about it may be questionable.
The one thing that I will point out though is that Mike is right… there are two ways of building a Microsoft Cluster – you can use the Failover Cluster Manager, or you can use System Center VMM. Michael points out that these technologies would do well to communicate better. I agree, and recommend that users pick one or the other. I would also like to point out that in vCenter Server you can create a cluster, but if you are only using ESXi (Vmware’s hypervisor) without vCenter Server there is no way to create a cluster… the technology is simply not supported unless you pay for it. Score one for Microsoft.
Mike, on a personal note, I would love to sit with you and show you the vastness of System Center and Microsoft’s Private Cloud one day. Geography seems to work against us, as you are (I believe) in Scotland, and I am in Japan. There is a catch though… I will gladly teach you Microsoft’s virtualization stack from top to bottom… but I want you to do the same for me with the vSphere stack. I know the technology and am certified, but I would cherish the opportunity to relearn it from you, as I have followed your articles with reverence for many years.
If you ever do care to take me up on the offer Mike, my email address is email@example.com. Drop me a line, we’ll figure it out. I suspect that we would both be able to write some great articles following those sessions, and we would both have newfound respect for the other’s technology of choice.
“On the first day of Christmas my true love gave to me…”
“Ninety-nine bottles of beer on the wall…”
“Thirty-five articles on Virtualization…”
Wait… you’ve never heard the last one? That’s okay, we are happy to teach it to you. It has a pretty catchy tune – the tune of cost savings, lower TCO, higher ROI, and a complete end-to-end management solution.
Even if you can’t remember the lyrics, why don’t you open up the articles – each one written by a member of Microsoft’s team of IT Pro Evangelists in the United States.
You can read along at your own pace, because no matter how fast or slow you read, as long as you are heading in the right direction then you are doing it right! –MDG
The 35 Articles on Virtualization:
|12-Aug-13||Series Introduction||Kevin Remde – @KevinRemde|
|13-Aug-13||What is a “Purpose-Built Hypervisor?||Kevin Remde – @KevinRemde|
|14-Aug-13||Simplified Microsoft Hyper-V Server 2012 Host Patching = Greater Security and More Uptime||Chris Avis – @ChrisAvis|
|15-Aug-13||Reducing VMware Storage Costs WITH Windows Server 2012 Storage Spaces||Keith Mayer – @KeithMayer|
|16-Aug-13||Does size really matter?||Brian Lewis – @BrianLewis_|
|19-Aug-13||Let’s talk certifications!||Matt Hester – @MatthewHester|
|20-Aug-13||Virtual Processor Scheduling||Tommy Patterson – @Tommy_Patterson|
|21-Aug-13||FREE Zero Downtime Patch Management||Keith Mayer – @KeithMayer|
|22-Aug-13||Agentless Protection||Chris Avis – @ChrisAvis|
|23-Aug-13||Site to Site Disaster Recovery with HRM||Keith Mayer – @KeithMayer|
|25-Aug-13||Destination: VMWorld||Jennelle Crothers – @jkc137|
|26-Aug-13||Get the “Scoop” on Hyper-V during VMworld||Matt Hester – @MatthewHester|
|27-Aug-13||VMWorld: Key Keynote Notes||Kevin Remde – @KevinRemde|
|28-Aug-13||VMWorld: Did you know that there is no extra charge?||Kevin Remde – @KevinRemde|
|29-Aug-13||VMWorld: A Memo to IT Leadership||Yung Chou – @YungChou|
|30-Aug-13||Moving Live Virtual Machines, Same But Different||Matt Hester – @MatthewHester|
|02-Sep-13||Not All Memory Management is Equal||Dan Stolts – @ITProGuru|
|03-Sep-13||Can I get an app with that?||Matt Hester – @MatthewHester|
|04-Sep-13||Deploying Naked Servers||Matt Hester – @MatthewHester|
|05-Sep-13||Automated Server Workload Balancing||Keith Mayer – @KeithMayer|
|06-Sep-13||Thoughts on VMWorld||Jennelle Crothers – @jkc137|
|09-Sep-13||Shopping for Private Clouds||Keith Mayer – @KeithMayer|
|11-Sep-13||Dynamic Storage Management in Private Clouds||Keith Mayer – @KeithMayer|
|12-Sep-13||Replaceable? or Extensible? What kind of virtual switch do you want?||Chris Avis – @ChrisAvis|
|13-Sep-13||Offloading your Storage||Matt Hester – @MatthewHester|
|16-Sep-13||VDI: A Look at Supportability and More!||Tommy Patterson – @Tommy_Patterson|
|17-Sep-13||Agentless Backup for Virtual Environments||Special Guest Chris Henley – @ChrisJHenley|
|19-Sep-13||How robust is your availability?||Kevin Remde – @KevinRemde|
|20-Sep-13||VM Guest Operating System Support||Brian Lewis – @BrianLewis_|
|23-Sep-13||How to license Windows Server VMs||Brian Lewis – @BrianLewis_|
|24-Sep-13||Comparing vSphere 5.5 and Windows Server 2012 R2 Hyper-V At-A-Glance||Keith Mayer – @KeithMayer|
|25-Sep-13||Evaluating Hyper-V Network Virtualization as an alternative to VMware NSX||Keith Mayer – @KeithMayer|
|26-Sep-13||Automation is the Key to Happiness||Matt Hester – @MatthewHester|
|27-Sep-13||Comparing Microsoft’s Public Cloud to VMware’s Public Cloud||Blain Barton – @BlainBar|
|30-Sep-13||What does AVAILABILITY mean in YOUR cloud?||Keith Mayer – @KeithMayer|
…and as for me? Well it’s pretty simple… just go to www.garvis.ca and type Virtualization into the search bar. You’ll see what I have to say too!
This month I will be speaking at the SMB Nation Fall Conference. My main presentation will be on what IT will look like for small- and mid-sized businesses in what I call the ‘Post-SBS Era.’ I will be discussing Private Cloud, System Center, Virtualization, Office 365, Azure, and Windows Intune.
I have also been asked to lead a panel of Microsoft MVPs. Topic: Open. I can pick a topic, or I can simply open the floor to questions. I briefly considered calling the panel ‘Whaddya mean you do it for FREE?!’ but thought better of it… however it would be fitting because MVPs do not get paid for what they do… at least not for what they do in order to be an MVP.
I have invited four other MVPs to join me on stage; until I get confirmation from all of them I will not reveal who they are. However I tried to select people with different experiences as MVPs. It should be an interesting time.
Over the past few days that I have been thinking about this panel I have given some thought to what it means to me. Last week I was recognized for the seventh time (Microsoft MVPs are awarded for a period of one year, and my award date is October 1st). I guess by now I can be considered a ‘veteran MVP,’ but I know that there are so many MVPs who have been around much longer than I have been.
In 2005 or 2006 there was an MVP Roadshow that came to Montreal; Jeff Middleton and the gang came up and after their day-long event, they agreed to do a user group event for us in the evening. Somebody in the audience asked Jeff ‘What is expected of you as MVPs?’ I expected Jeff to start talking about speaking to user groups, answering questions in the forums and newsgroups, and whatever else. He surprised me when he answered (not a direct quote) ‘Nothing. The MVP Award is strictly for past contributions. It is not a contract, and you are not actually expected to do anything further.’
It was an interesting answer, and on the surface an honest and accurate one. It does not, however, account for the fact that if MVPs want to continue being MVPs then there are certain expectations of us. Depending on several factors I think those expectations are not the same for all of us, but that is another topic altogether.
In November 2004 I had a conversation with a young Harp Girn who was at the time a vendor with Microsoft Canada. He had, earlier in the evening, gotten me to volunteer to start a user group in Montreal for IT Professionals. He made it clear to me that although he and his team would help, there wouldn’t be any direct, tangible benefits. ‘I can’t make any promises, but a lot of user group leaders get recognized as Microsoft MVPs.’ I am not sure, but it may have been the first time I had ever heard the term. He was right – 23 months later I did get the award.
It has been an incredible six years… My life, my career, my outlook have changed so much in that time, and who knew – a lot of that change can be traced back to the MVP Award. Most of that indirectly of course, but a lot of the opportunities that I have been afforded over the past several years have been because I was an MVP. Microsoft Canada has done a lot for me, and oftentimes it was because of a conversation started with the phrase ‘…do you know of any MVPs who could do this for us?’ Many of the certifications I hold (especially the Charter certs) are because Microsoft Learning sent out invites to write beta exams to… you guessed it – MVPs.
Shortly after I received the award for the first time a consulting firm asked me to do some work with them – it started as training roadshows but eventually evolved into courseware creation. When they asked me what I knew about server virtualization I replied honestly that I knew nothing about it. They had me learn, and that would eventually evolve into several career-changing moments, not the least of which was the opportunity to write Microsoft’s original courseware (e-learning) for Hyper-V. That led to roadshows of course, and a company that heard about me because of the roadshow asked if I would be interested in learning VMware and then consulting and teaching it for them in Canada (and eventually internationally). The original consulting firm that got the ball rolling on this told me point-blank that they would not have considered me had I not been a Microsoft MVP.
When the Partner team at Microsoft Canada decided to create a program called the Virtual Partner Technology Advisors, they looked for MVPs who were strong on virtualization. That led to dozens of contracts over the course of several years, as well as the opportunity to present myself as one of the foremost VMware-compete guys in the country.
And of course, when the DPE Team at Microsoft Canada started discussing a new position called ‘Virtual Technical Evangelist’ they again looked for MVPs.
Someone asked me earlier today what I would do if I wasn’t doing what I do. It’s a tough question and frankly I cannot fathom an answer. I guess I need more time, but I’ll come up with something, I promise. The question got me thinking (and not for the first time) where I would be today if I had not put my hand up to volunteer to create a local user group in Montreal, which in turn led to my eventual nomination as a Microsoft MVP. The consequences of that single action are impossible to quantify, but let’s start with a quick list:
- I would probably still be living in Montreal
- I would likely have a couple of certifications… but nowhere near what I have today.
- I would not have the vast majority of the friends I have made over the past eight years.
- I would never have met my wife and her (now OUR) son, and we would not have had our baby.
- It is unlikely that I would be a Black Belt
- It is unfathomable that I would have several positions within Microsoft
- It is highly doubtful I would have started a blog that today is read by ten thousand readers per month
- I would never have had the opportunity to travel to 8 provinces (several times), 35 states (with many repeats), and twelve countries on behalf of companies like Microsoft and HP
- I would never have been asked to consult on deployment projects for companies on the Fortune 15 list, nor for such organizations as the New York Police Department.
Wow… that is a simple list that took me all of five minutes to compile, but each point is easy to make the case for. I honestly believe that had I not been awarded the Microsoft MVP way back then my life would have gone in a very different direction. I cannot fathom what it would look like today… but it isn’t a stretch to guess that broader minds bring broader opportunities, and I would not be doing as well were I still living in Montreal servicing small business IT shops.
So while Microsoft uses the MVP Program as a thank-you for its community leaders, I expect a lot of us owe Microsoft a big thank-you back for the opportunities that have come about from our award.
On July 5th I published an article titled A Response to VMware’s ‘Get the Facts’ page comparing vSphere to Hyper-V & System Center’. In the seven weeks since it went live it has become the 4th most read article I have ever published (in seven years as a blogger), as well as being by far the most commented on, discussed, and shared article I have ever written.
André Andriolli, a former VMware field engineer and now a Systems Engineer Manager with VMware in Brazil, responded very well. One of the first points he made was:
we should start by comparing what’s in the market TODAY with what’s in the market today: I mean vSphere 5 versus Hyper-V 2, or vSphere 5.1 with Hyper-V 3. Since vSphere 5.1 news are not in the street yet, we should go with the first. Comparing a future MSFT release with what VMware customers are running for over 1 year now is simply not fair, to me at least.
While I did not entirely agree with this at the time, I accept that it is a valid point. I am looking forward to hearing comments in the next few weeks though… as Windows Server 2012 (with Hyper-V 3.0) becomes generally available on September 4th, and vSphere 5.1 becomes available on September 11th.
My opinion is simple… VMware still makes a great product, but so does Microsoft; the benefits of the former, in my opinion (and that of many VMware customers I have spoken with), simply are not worth the the difference in cost over the latter. While it will be a relief that VMware is abandoning their Virtual Memory Entitlements (commonly referred to as the Memory Tax), I think the last year will have left a sour note with a lot of their customers, and given them an opportunity to see for themselves just how good Hyper-V really is.
I do like the fact that both platforms are being released at the same time though; I once made a comment that I regretted right away that of course one would always be ahead of the other because one would come out with a new feature, and the other would take that feature and include it in their next release, along with whatever else they were planning, and that would continue on. For the next year the two will be compared as equals.
Now, this is one place where VMware has a slight advantage… insofar as they have a one-year product cycle, and Windows Server has a 3-year product cycle. This was adjusted last year when they took the rare step of adding new (and major) functionality into Service Pack 1 of Windows Server 2008 R2. For now, frankly I am not sure that pound for pound Hyper-V (with System Center) is not already the better product. I guess we will find out what the market says though…
If you are in Toronto, we would love for you to join us for the Windows Server 2012 Launch Event on September 5th, or if you are in another city across Canada, later in the month. Check out Ruth Morton’s blog to see the dates, and to click to register. We hope to see you there!
- A Response to VMware’s ‘Get the Facts’ page comparing vSphere to Hyper-V & System Center (garvis.ca)
- Is it true? The Memory Tax is gone! (garvis.ca)
- Windows Fever… Catch It! (garvis.ca)
CRN is reporting that next week at VMworld VMware will be announcing that they are doing away with Virtual Memory Entitlements, which you have probably heard me refer to as the Memory Tax.
According to the article (http://www.crn.com/news/cloud/240005840/vmware-kills-vram-licensing-will-focus-on-vsphere-cloud-bundles.htm?cid=nl_alert) VMware is trying to regain its competitive edge over Microsoft’s Hyper-V, which has over the past couple of years soared to nearly 30% market share, making it the fastest growing virtualization platform in the industry.
This is the first time I can remember that VMware is showing any signs that they are trying to compete against the scrappy and powerful competitor. I heard from a source at VMware that they have heard from a great many clients that they are either testing Hyper-V out on a few servers or, in some cases, switching completely. This comes as no surprise in a year when VMware introduced the hated Virtual Memory Requirements, and when Microsoft has made such incredible strides to make Hyper-V 3 as good or better than its larger competitor.
It will come as no surprise to readers of this blog that I was shocked by the Memory Tax, and predicted a year ago it would badly hurt VMware’s market share. In a day and age when competition is getting better, giving their hypervisor away with the operating system, and bundling the management tools with the System Center suite (which the vast majority of companies already own) it simply made no sense for VMware to make virtualization more expensive than they already had.
VMware will be launching vSphere 5.1 at VMworld next week, and the worst of times will be over for their fans. I wonder however if they can turn the ship around… you cannot unring a bell, and the companies who have tried Hyper-V for the first time in the past year have seen what their alternatives are. IT managers have to consider costs, and if the less expensive product is just as good (and is supported by the largest software company in the world) then it will be interesting to see how many of them make the switch over the first twelve months of Hyper-V 3.0 with Server 2012, which RTMed August first and is set to become publically available in early September.
In other News:
Several VMware customers have told me they have received an e-mail that looks like this one:
“… I am your renewals representative from VMware. I wanted to reach out to you regarding a Renewals promotion that we are running through September 30, 2012.
VMware is making an extended effort this year to bring current any expired customers to allow for reinstated SnS and the ability to upgrade to the newest version of vSphere (VS5). Throughout this one-time promotion, we will be offering two separate options with 100% waiver of reinstatement on your expired licenses and up to 100% waiver of your back-dated maintenance; saving you at least 20% on your renewal cost.
By reinstating your support via this promotion, you could save thousands of dollars and regain access to technical support and the most current releases. While supported, you will be eligible for upgrades and updates as well as technical support, both online and via our Customer Support Technicians.
I would be happy to discuss the promotion and answer any questions you may have. Again, this offer is only valid through September 30, 2012; therefore, please let me know if you would like to see pricing options and I will have those generated. If you have further questions about this promotion, please feel free to contact me directly at the information below, or contact RenewalsHotlineAMER@vmware.com
If you are interested in quotes to see how much getting your products back on support would be please let me know and I am happy to get these for you.”
I am not surprised. For the first time in its history VMware will have seen decreased sales in the past year, especially when it comes to renewing SnS contracts. When they launched vSphere 5 (and the hated Memory Tax) they gave existing clients a ridiculously short window to make the commitment to upgrading their licenses… something like 30 days. A great many companies decided to either stick with vSphere 4.1, which meant that they would avoid the Memory Tax, or better yet, begin the process of migrating their existing vSphere servers onto Hyper-V.
It does not surprise me at all that the company is now looking for ways to get that lost business back, even taking the unprecedented steps of lowering the costs AND waiving the penalties. Unfortunately for them, as I wrote earlier in this article, you cannot unring a bell. For the die-hard fans who stayed with vSphere 4.1 this might be enticing, but for companies that dipped their toes into the waters of Hyper-V, and were anxiously awaiting the public release of Hyper-V 3.0, there is no going back.
I have been and will continue to teach those professionals and companies how to best leverage their Microsoft virtualization platform… Welcome aboard!
- A Response to VMware’s ‘Get the Facts’ page comparing vSphere to Hyper-V & System Center (garvis.ca)